Skip to content
The Esopus Creek — whose stream management is currently being reevaluated to meet sometimes-competing needs — discharges into the Hudson adjacent to Saugerties Lighthouse. (Jeff Mertz / Scenic Hudson)

Balancing Clean-Water Needs Along the Lower Esopus Creek

NYC residents need drinking water. Valley residents deserve a clean creek discharging into the Hudson. Authorities are trying new ways to benefit all.

by John Ferro
Share:

On a cold January evening in 2024, a group of property owners along the Lower Esopus Creek gathered inside a darkened senior center in the Town of Ulster. Lit by the glow of a video projector, they learned of the latest developments in what has been a more than century-long tug of war between the drinking water needs of New York City’s residents, and the property rights and ecosystem health of several Ulster County towns.

At issue these days is a permitting battle between the state and the city over how the city’s Department of Environmental Protection manages high water levels in the Ashokan Reservoir, and how it removes silt and other sediment from the water that flows through the largest unfiltered water system in the nation.

The Lower Esopus Creek passes through the towns of Marbletown, Hurley, Ulster, and Saugerties before discharging into the Hudson, and residents enjoy recreation like paddling along it when it’s not being filled with discharge. (Photo: Courtesy @thehealingacres)

It is a system that provides approximately 1.2 billion gallons of drinking water to nearly half the state’s population every day, satisfying 8 million thirsty NYC residents, as well as 1 million consumers in Ulster, Orange, Putnam, and Westchester counties.

Among the system’s 19 reservoirs is the 8,315-acre Ashokan Reservoir, completed in 1915 by way of the construction of 5.5 miles of dams and dikes along the western portion of the Esopus Creek. To construct it, the city removed residents of 11 communities, relocated a handful of buildings, and burned the rest to the ground, the foundations of which have surfaced eerily above the Ashokan’s waterline during times of drought.

More than a century later, the latest reminder of the city’s hubris is not from a lack of water, but rather too much of it. In an effort to meet increasingly stringent federal and state water requirements, the NYC DEP has been flushing muddy, turbid water into the Lower Esopus, causing flooding, ecosystem damage, and anguish to those who live along what the Environmental Protection Agency now calls an “impaired” waterbody.

The Ashokan Reservoir, a primary water source for New York City, provides drinking water to nearly half the state’s residents every day. (Photo: Bentley Potter Photography)

Residents who live near the creek — which passes through the towns of Marbletown, Hurley, Ulster, and Saugerties before discharging into the Hudson River — said at January’s meeting that they felt increasingly helpless. The reason many moved to the area was for a higher quality of life. The discharge, they said, made them feel that was being eroded every day.

During heavy rainstorms, glacial till and other sediments in a 256-square mile watershed wash down the Upper Esopus and into the Ashokan Reservoir. The reservoir was built with two basins, one which allows sediment to settle out of the water before moving into a second basin that feeds an aqueduct serving the supply system.

Major storms in 2005 and 2006 overwhelmed the basin system, leading to flooding downstream. In 2007, the NYC DEP received a permit for the state to use aluminum sulfate, an additive that binds to particles in a water column, makes them heavier, and drives them to the bottom. The city also began releasing millions of gallons of turbid water downstream into the Lower Esopus.

In an effort to meet federal and state water requirements, the NYC DEP has been flushing muddy, turbid water into the Lower Esopus. (Photo: Courtesy @MikeNelsonProductions)

These steps have allowed the city to keep its water delivery system unfiltered at a huge cost savings. Municipal systems that rely on surface waters are allowed to remain unfiltered so long as they meet strict criteria established by the EPA. Were the city to run afoul of the criteria, it could be ordered to install a filtration system that has been estimated to cost as much as $10 billion to build and $1 million a day to operate. A much cheaper option is simply to dump the silty water downstream.

By 2011, Ulster County residents had had enough. County officials threatened to sue the city over the muddy discharges – as much as 600 million gallons a day. While some turbidity is natural, especially given the glacial history of the watershed, the releases have had harmful impacts on wildlife, fishing, and recreational tourism, according to a stream management plan for the Lower Esopus that is being prepared by Ulster County.

“Prolonged turbidity exposure has been shown to impact fish community structure,” the plan states. “The primary impacts are a result of decreased primary productivity on food webs, siltation in gravel spawning habitat, and decreases in visual predation abilities.”

The Lower Esopus looks inviting at certain times, yet releases of muddy water have had harmful impacts on wildlife, fishing, and recreational tourism, according to a stream management plan being prepared by Ulster County. (Photo: Courtesy @EsopusCreekNeighbors)

In response to the lawsuit threat, the city began reducing the levels of the discharges and entered into an agreement with the state in 2013 to better manage both turbidity and release levels. In addition to requiring a less impactful, interim release protocol, the agreement also requires the city to pay a $2.7 million civil penalty, most of which will fund environmental improvement projects.

That money is still unspent, however, and the city has failed to come up with an acceptable management plan. A draft plan released in 2021 was roundly criticized by officials, environmental groups, and residents, many of whom noted that the muddy releases affect not only the Lower Esopus, but also the Hudson River, which serves as a source of drinking water for more than 100,000 people in seven communities.

In response, the state required NYC DEP to redo the plan, a process that could take another five years. The glacial-like pace of change has left some residents frustrated.

Ulster County officials threatened to sue New York City over the impacts of discharges. Now a new management plan is being developed for the Lower Esopus. (Photo: Courtesy @MikeNelsonProductions)

“How many more studies are needed?” Lake Katrine resident Pedro Santiago asked at the January meeting. “How many surveys have to be done? How many times does the water have to be tested? And money is being spent on these. We listen. We fill out forms. And it goes nowhere.”

And yet, others point to the impact that public outcry had on the city’s initial plan. Nearly 1,300 comments were submitted, according to the state DEC. January’s meeting in the Town of Ulster was held, in part, to gain input from residents as to how some of the city’s penalty payment should be used. Those recommendations will be included in a management plan for the Lower Esopus.

“The goal with this project is to outline visions, goals, and specific recommendations,” says Ben Ganon, an environmental resource technician with Ulster County. “And then we have $2 million that is non-state, non-federal money, so it can be used as a match. The goal is to leverage that into additional funds and really generate more money to work with.”

Under normal conditions, the Esopus Creek (shown here near Saugerties) invites enjoyment along its way to discharging into the Hudson. (Photo: @EsopusCreekNeighbors)

Mary McNamara is a longtime local advocate who has worked with the Hudson River Watershed Alliance, the Esopus Creek Conservancy, the Ashokan Watershed Stream Management Program, and the Lower Esopus Watershed Partnership. She sees the Lower Esopus management plan as a piece of the larger, ongoing effort to ensure manageable and even beneficial releases from Ashokan. “This,” she told those gathered at the meeting, “is an opportunity for you to say what you are thinking, what you hope, what you have noticed.”

The public will have an opportunity to weigh in again when the city updates its draft impact statement. In addition to a “comprehensive examination” of the water-release impacts and a deep analysis of mitigation alternatives, the city has been ordered to address the impacts of climate change, which are expected to bring more frequent and heavier rain events. And a recent meeting left at least some residents optimistic that officials are taking their concerns seriously and are prepared to make policy changes.

Slow as it may be, McNamara says, the work “is an opportunity to right some wrongs.”

John Ferro serves as editorial director at the Omega Institute for Holistic Studies in Rhinebeck. Prior to joining Omega, he spent 26 years as an award-winning reporter and senior editor at the Poughkeepsie Journal, most recently covering the environment.

Related Content

Editors' Picks

Climate Solutions
How to Get in on the Refillability Game
Land + Air + Water
Restoring Resilience to Mawignack Preserve
Land + Air + Water
Can Hops Make a Comeback in New York?
A close view of a hop growing on a vine. Behind it is a red barn.
Land + Air + Water
Protecting Forests by Managing the Exploding Deer Population
Climate Solutions
Floatovoltaics Makes Waves Approaching the Valley

Search Viewfinder:

Hudson Valley Viewfinder is a collaborative, community digital magazine sharing what inspires us about the beautiful Hudson Valley. We publish original stories and multimedia content about all things sustainable in the region along the Hudson River — including agriculture, science, wildlife, outdoor recreation, green transportation, environmental justice, and more.

Our mission is to immerse you in the storied history, fresh happenings, and coming solutions for making the Hudson Valley greener and more livable long-term.

Viewfinder is published by Scenic Hudson, the celebrated nonprofit credited with launching the modern grassroots environmental movement in 1963. With over 25,000 passionate supporters, Scenic Hudson’s mission is to sustain and enhance the Hudson Valley’s inspirational beauty and health for generations to come. Viewfinder supports that mission, because the better people understand what makes this place special, the more they will invest in protecting it. 

Keep up with the latest stories by subscribing to Scenic Hudson’s monthly digital newsletter, and connect with us on social via Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Threads.

Our mission is to immerse you in the storied history, fresh happenings, and coming solutions for making the Hudson Valley greener and more livable long-term.

Viewfinder is published by Scenic Hudson, the celebrated nonprofit credited with launching the modern grassroots environmental movement in 1963. With over 25,000 passionate supporters, Scenic Hudson’s mission is to sustain and enhance the Hudson Valley’s inspirational beauty and health for generations to come. Viewfinder supports that mission, because the better people understand what makes this place special, the more they will invest in protecting it. 

Keep up with the latest stories by subscribing to Scenic Hudson’s monthly digital newsletter, and connect with us on social via Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Threads.

Lynn Freehill-Maye
Managing Editor
editorial@scenichudson.org 

Riley Johndonnell
Director Creative Strategies & Communications
rjohndonnell@scenichudson.org

Lynn Freehill-Maye
Managing Editor
editorial@scenichudson.org 

Riley Johndonnell
Director Creative Strategies & Communications
rjohndonnell@scenichudson.org

We’re always looking for ideas around our main topic areas of Climate Solutions, Land + Air + Water, Plants + Animals, History + Culture, Outdoors, and Community.
  • Journalists and writers who have deep familiarity with New York and the Hudson Valley, we’d love to have you contribute! Please do introduce yourself by email, sharing writing samples and any relevant pitches you may have.
  • Photographers and videographers, we’d love to hear from you and see what you do. Please send along a portfolio with images or footage that showcases your best and/or most relevant work, with an emphasis on anything captured outdoors. 
  • Illustrators, we commission artwork on the regular. Drop us a note with some of the beauty you’ve created.
  • Media Partners & Social Media Influencers, we welcome opportunities to team up on series and campaigns. Reach out with any background about yourselves and your ideas.
We’re always looking for ideas around our main topic areas of Climate Solutions, Land + Air + Water, Plants + Animals, History + Culture, Outdoors, and Community.
  • Journalists and writers who have deep familiarity with New York and the Hudson Valley, we’d love to have you contribute! Please do introduce yourself by email, sharing writing samples and any relevant pitches you may have.
  • Photographers and videographers, we’d love to hear from you and see what you do. Please send along a portfolio with images or footage that showcases your best and/or most relevant work, with an emphasis on anything captured outdoors. 
  • Illustrators, we commission artwork on the regular. Drop us a note with some of the beauty you’ve created.
  • Media Partners & Social Media Influencers, we welcome opportunities to team up on series and campaigns. Reach out with any background about yourselves and your ideas.
  • We love to collaborate with media outlets, especially on episodic series (like these) of interest to our shared audiences. Past collaborations have included radio interviews, panel discussions and other events, original artwork, and e-blasts, all furthering the campaign’s excitement and reach. 
  • We also love to partner with other organizations whose missions align with Scenic Hudson’s. Feel free to reach out with some background on your group and its work.
  • Writers, photographers, and creatives, if you have an idea for a series or content campaign that might be a good fit, drop us a line!

Businesses, please note that as a nonprofit, Scenic Hudson is restricted from advertising or promoting for-profit companies, through Viewfinder or other outlets. While we understand content managers may wish to alert us to your company’s role in a relevant topic, we are unable to add links to businesses to our stories.

  • We love to collaborate with media outlets, especially on episodic series (like these) of interest to our shared audiences. Past collaborations have included radio interviews, panel discussions and other events, original artwork, and e-blasts, all furthering the campaign’s excitement and reach. 
  • We also love to partner with other organizations whose missions align with Scenic Hudson’s. Feel free to reach out with some background on your group and its work.
  • Writers, photographers, and creatives, if you have an idea for a series or content campaign that might be a good fit, drop us a line!

Businesses, please note that as a nonprofit, Scenic Hudson is restricted from advertising or promoting for-profit companies, through Viewfinder or other outlets. While we understand content managers may wish to alert us to your company’s role in a relevant topic, we are unable to add links to businesses to our stories.

Subscribe!

Get the latest articles delivered right to your inbox  — for FREE!